My Links

Syndication

 
Listed on BlogsCanada
Posted by eleanor

My Canada is owned by the government

From today's Ottawa Citizen: "The federal government is spending nearly a quarter of a million dollars a year chasing down people who take Canada's name in vain, and making them stop. If you use our country's coat of arms without permission, the Treasury Board will tell you to cease and desist. Same thing with the 'wordmark' -- the 'Canada' with the little flag over the final letter."

Who's been targeted? BlogsCanada, for one (its logo can be found elsewhere on this page). And the Sex Trade Workers of Canada. "Their website posts news about prostitutes: For instance, how police in Calgary are investigating a prostitute's death, and a list of missing women. It used to feature the Canadian coat of arms. No longer. Today the site restricts itself to a map of Canada, and a photo of a blond woman in a jaunty, not-quite-Mountie outfit. (The skirt seems suspiciously micro). And they're not happy with their treatment."

They were threatened with charges.

The queer heroes at Vancouver's Little Sister's Book & Art Emporium were also slammed. The story doesn't give details -- but gosh, isn't it odd how Little Sisters fights the power, then keeps getting targeted? An odd coincidence indeed.

"The federal government is using the Canadian Trademark and Copyright Act to maintain the value of a recognized set of symbols for the good of the country."

Not my country, though. Somebody else's version of my country.

Comments

# re: My Canada is owned by the government
April 26, 2006 10:37 AM
From Little Sister's:

How interesting. I had no idea such information was available to the public. Now Little Sister's name is again in the news, for something that transpired 2 years ago.

As far as we're concerned there was not much of an issue here at all. At the time we were supporting a "links" site and had created some graphics incorporating the Canada logo. Upon request we removed all the images in question. End of story, really...

They were firm, but polite and gave us a resonable amount of time to make the changes. Of course, one has to wonder why we were selected for a "check", but in the end this was not an issue we wanted to make waves about. It seemed to be a clear cut case of the goverments right to protect it's copyright and we still have other (more pressing) issues on the table.
 
Thanks for including us in your blog.
 
Sincerely,
 David Carlyle
  (webmaster)
-