My Links

Syndication

 
Listed on BlogsCanada
Posted by eleanor

Karla Homolka

Convicted killer Karla Homolka Teale still has two months to go in jail, and the hysteria's already reaching fever pitch. This morning's Montreal Gazette reports that Homolka may soon be moving to the west end Montreal neighbourhood of Notre Dame de Grace.

Other recent coverage includes panic over a related movie and the government of Ontario's desire to track her movements for the rest of her life (now guaranteed to be pretty miserable).

Homolka Teale was given a controversial 12-year sentence for helping kill two teenage girls with her hubby, Paul Bernardo (himself undoubtedly to rot in jail forever); part of her defence was that as an abused wife, she was only partially responsible for her actions.

In the intervening years, we've watched this play out. First, she was easy prey for killers seeking collaborators. Now she's an inhuman monster all on her own. I wrote this in 2000: "I've been wondering about the ethics of outing Karla Homolka. I've no sympathy for her; she's a murderer pure and simple. But is she allowed privacy?

"'Exclusive: Karla's Jailhouse Lover,' blared the cover of the March 26 Toronto Sun. 'She's waiting for killer's release so they can live together.' And the story is four full pages.

"First, the stupid stuff. Writers Alan Cairns and Laura Bobak (who should know better) have penned stereotypical rubbish. Stuff like how Homolka's lover Lynda Veronneau is a 'dominant criminal... who walks like a man and has a deep throaty voice.' In straight nightclubs, that voice is considered pretty sexy.

"Veronneau has denied a relationship with Homolka, but the Sun printed the gossip anyway.

"Veronneau is butch. Apparently, that also makes her 'a leader in her lesbian relationships.' Because Homolka was portrayed as husband Paul Bernardo's dupe in the sex killings of women, she now runs the risk of Veronneau (a thief and drug addict) controlling her in just the same way. (Methinks it's the femmes who have twisted me about their little fingers, and not the other way around.)

"A lawyer working against Homolka... is quoted as saying that the lesbian relationship proves that she's a liar. Homolka testified that she wasn’t a lesbian and that she didn't enjoy having sex with the kidnapped women.

"Was Homolka in charge, or playing out Bernardo's fantasies? Is she bisexual, or have her sexual interests changed? Can she pay her debt to society and be rehabilitated, or is she a [psychopath who'll continue on]? These are questions that can't be answered.

"And what does any of that mean for her right to privacy?"

Comments

# re: Karla Homolka
June 6, 2005 9:24 AM
"The palpable fear and loathing Canadians harbour for Karla Homolka has many observers, including a group dedicated to helping female ex-convicts rebuild their lives, doubting whether the schoolgirl killer will ever be able to successfully re-integrate into society. Still, while the prospect of something resembling a normal life might seem a distant fantasy for Canada's most notorious female offender, one expert in recasting public perception says it may not necessarily be a mission impossible."

The rest is here:
http://www.recorder.ca/cp/National/050605/n060577A.html
# re: Karla Homolka
June 5, 2005 10:14 PM
When the original crime news broke, I was more disturbed by this than Bosnia (yeah a bit out of proportion). At issue was not only the viciousness with which these crimes were committed, but the ease with which family and friendship trust was utterly violated. In essence, being in proximity to this woman (or her husband) is Freddy Kruger stuff. Reading about her imminent release and her relatively summer-camp incarceration lends me to suspect that she has only been emboldened in manipulating both the system,,,and people who are inclined to place trust in human relationships.
# re: Karla Homolka
June 5, 2005 3:44 PM
send me a email some time Karla maybe we can talk i do have faith in you and i think you need some honest friends.
anoasis1@hotmail.com
# re: Karla Homolka
June 5, 2005 2:59 PM
i think that karla is getting a rough ride,i think we all should just but out and leave her to live her life,maybe she will go the straight and narrow mabe she wont but lets wait and see.i know i have faith in her and i dont know her. good luck Karla
# re: Karla Homolka
June 5, 2005 2:52 PM
you are fucking sick in the head... you dont deserve to be let out of jail.. so you ratted out your fucking sick husband that doesnt give you the right to be free you disgusting fucking life ruiner. i hope you realize the extent of your actions.. you have impacted the life of thousands probly more, turned thier stomachs.. i fcuking almost cried reading your list of crimes... why would any nation in the right mind let you free.. im disgusted and if we belived in capital punishment i would fry you and paul in less than the blink of one eye... how can you forgive crimes such as the ones you have committed. i dont hate people easily.. but i can say i hate you and everything you stand for. i dont even know you.. but if i were ever to be in your presence i would hang my head in shame because i cant belive our nation would let such a sick human being out of jail.. hmm well maybe not the only way id let you out of jail is if i was transfering you to a phsyc ward. i hope you enjoy quebec you fucking dreg of society.
# I may be a murderer, but I'm no lesbian
June 5, 2005 9:45 AM
# re: Karla Homolka
June 5, 2005 9:43 AM
Reports in this morning's paper say Karla Leanne Teale has a lawyer working on a legal name change. She had also hoped to live a quiet life in Quebec, where she thought media coverage of her crimes in the world of anglo Ontario would not be big news. Ha!

Other news: she's been transferred out of Joliette and to the Regional Reception Centre in Ste. Anne des Plaines.
# re: Karla Homolka
June 3, 2005 11:20 PM
Karla Teale/Homolka/Bernardo, whatever she's using these days, is a sadistic sexual deviant who should be sitting along side her depraved husband. Put them in prison together, they deserve each other and anything dished out to them. She's just as guilty as he is in the murders, if not more so.

She's neither spineless nor a coward as some suggest. She's a cunning, extremely clever bitch who knows how to scheme and play the 'poor me' part very well. She knows the law and how to twist it to suit herself. She knew they were caught and knew what had to be done to get off.

I and many many others, fully believe SHE killed those girls, not just helped, and got away with it by lies and manipulation. Her degenerate husband Paul admitted to every other charge they threw at him in court except killing them. He said "I raped her yes, yes I am Scarborough rapist, yes I kidnapped Kristen, yes I did take Laurie, yes I did this, yes I did that. No, "I" didn't kill those girls." So, why would a man, and I use that term very lightly here, who is up the creek for life anyway, admit to every charge but one? Because SHE did it. And her lawyer knew it. He helped her conceal the tapes and ensure she got a sweetheart deal before he quit. She gives women everywhere a bad name.

And furthermore, I believe she WILL do it again. Maybe her and her 'new' man are already plotting who and when. Ohhhh, she'll be a 'good girl' for the year the restrictions are heavily imposed on her, then things will start happening again. Subtly of course. She'll likely disappear. You won't even know if she's the lady who moved in next door to YOU. She won't have so many people watching her, things will be 'blown over' some by then and she'll begin her terror again on some other unsuspecting young girl, maybe YOUR sister, or YOUR little girl.

They say she's gotten a degree in child psychology in prison. Nice eh? She's supposedly dying her hair black and cutting it off short. I'd watch your child's next years school counselor if I were you. I know I will.
# re: Karla Homolka
June 3, 2005 6:07 PM
Judge imposes restrictions on Karla -- she'll be released in a few days

"Karla Homolka must report to police after her release from prison and advise them of her address and who she's living with, a judge ruled Friday. Quebec court Judge Jean Beaulieu also said the schoolgirl killer must not communicate with her ex-husband Paul Bernardo, the families of their victioms or any violent criminals.

"Homolka showed no emotion as Beaulieu read out the restrictions.

"Homolka, 35, must also follow therapy and give police 96 hours' notice if she wants to leave Quebec. She also will be forbidden from being with people under the age of 16 and from consuming drugs other than prescription drugs.

"Beaulieu said the Crown's fears that Homolka is a risk to reoffend were reasonable."

More here!
http://www.recorder.ca/cp/National/050603/n0603111A.html
# re: Karla Homolka
June 3, 2005 3:31 PM
How could you do that to ur lil sister she was only 15 years old i hope u feel like shit for the rest of ur life, man Oh and by the way u dont do anything a man demands u to do, they're supposed do what u want them to!!!
# re: Karla Homolka
June 3, 2005 11:53 AM
More confusion: "A psychiatrist who has evaluated Karla Homolka testified Friday that the schoolgirl killer's relationship with a convicted murderer may not have been a sexual adventure. Reports have suggested Homolka has become romantically involved with Jean-Paul Gerbet, who is up for parole in 2008 for the murder of his girlfriend seven years ago."

Rest at
http://www.recorder.ca/cp/National/050603/n060313A.html
# re: Karla Homolka
June 3, 2005 11:04 AM
This morning's Montreal broadsheets are a study in contrast. The anglo Gazette (a CanWest production) headline reads: "Homolka picks Montreal -- but won't say where." Subheads: "Sex killer at hearing; Sits stone-faced in prisoner's dock but cries as cop tells of her sister's death." (Interestingly, the reporter on CBC TV last night said merely that Homolka dabbed her eyes with a tissue and asked a guard to get her more; there was no indication that the reporter actually saw tears.)

And now for something completely different, today's La Presse headline: Homolka n'est pas dangereuse: La plupart des specialists qui l'ont examine sont formels." Roughly translated, most shrinks who interviewed her say Homolka not dangerous.

And the story's lead sentence: Only one of the 20 psychologists and doctors who have examine Homolka since her 1993 incarceration have concluded she's no threat to society.

Amazing manipulator, truly not dangerous, or perhaps even someone who's smart enough to know she's screwed if she attacks anyone on the outside, ever again? I do worry that treating her as someone who's expected to offend again... could be a self-fulfilling prophecy. Treat someone like a criminal, and they have nothing to lose by saying, "Fine, have it your way."

Also in the papers: The details of Homolka's sexually tinged correspondence with another jailbird, a charming guy convicted of killing his girlfriend. I am prepared to admit that perhaps Homolka does not have the best judgement.
# re: Karla Homolka
June 2, 2005 11:55 PM
I think Karla Homolka should not step one foot in montreal. Just the idea of her living in my country, someone so naive, disgusting. She was never scared of her husband!! She is a waste of a human life. I can't describe the negative feelings that i have for her. All i have been doing is reading articles and researching her up. And more the information i read, the more i feel like throwing up on her face. I was only 5 years old when all this stuff happened but had i been older, i would have tried my best to make sure her sentence was longer then 12 years. Now she will be getting out this summer, i really hope she doesn't last long in this civilized world. She is a disgust to human race. She should be in a jail for life, she encouraged her husband, not even, man.. to commit those horrendous crimes!! i mean to her own sister!! how can someone change after 12 years.. certainly not her, she will continue to find fetishes in life, encourage other serial killers. my anger is so built up and i speak for all Canadians! She doesn't deserve another chance at life!
# re: Karla Homolka
June 1, 2005 5:28 PM
Hi Karla Homolka.. my name is darryl from oakville ontario.. really think that Karla will be no threat to anybody, for the simple reason that, I believe that she is nothing i can beleive u dont do that AGAIAN!!! you RE VERY SMART Woman,.... please dont do that again...... thank.. can u send me email if u want...
darrylwesley@hotmail.com

Have a Great Day
Take Care
# re: Karla Homolka
May 31, 2005 10:13 AM
Here's what I received late yesterday from the E Fry Society:

Dear Ms Brown,

Unfortunately, prisoners rarely have access to computers and have no access to the internet or email.

Kim Pate
Canadian Association of Elizabeth Fry Societies (CAEFS)
#701, 151 Slater Street
Ottawa, Ontario
K1P 5H3

Email: kpate@web.ca
Web Site: www.elizabethfry.ca
# re: Karla Homolka
May 30, 2005 6:37 PM
I really think that Karla will be no threat to anybody, for the simple reason that, I believe that she is nothing but a spineless coward who needed the help of a so called man to do these unspeakable crimes she has committed. The sad thing about the whole situation of her release is that for one, she should never get out of prison, no matter what deal she made with anybody and secondly, why should she be given any money to live from the government when there are homeless, hungry people, living in our country who haven't kidnapped, raped and murdered anybody and they are turned away from the very same government?
# re: Karla Homolka
May 29, 2005 9:19 PM
I've asked the Elizabeth Fry Society if they're forwarding mail to Karla Teale; will post any response I receive. The folks at the E. Fry advocate on behalf of female prisoners and offer some services.

Here's the society's website:
http://www.elizabethfry.ca/
# re: Karla Homolka
May 28, 2005 10:22 PM
Does anyone know how to email Ms. Teale?
# re: Karla Homolka
May 28, 2005 9:33 AM
From the May 26 Toronto Now mag:

"As Karla Homolka's July release approaches, the Toronto Sun is indulging in disgusting "murder porn," running bombshell shots of the killer almost daily. Homolka was on the front page twice recently, and regularly appears inside, while her victims were on the cover once. This from a paper claiming to care about law and order and wanting more women readers. No wonder the Sun's readership is in free fall and its publisher has quit to slink back to England. The Little Paper That Sucks."

The original's at http://www.nowtoronto.com/issues/2005-05-26/news_upfront.php
# re: Karla Homolka
May 7, 2005 9:15 AM
Please, spare me the slippery femmes who can't be trusted and are the consummate manipulators. The nasty flip side of passive femininity is disloyal femininity - as far as the (butch/male) powers that be are concerned. In either case femmes' desire/agency is simply about getting what they want from big studly types - no matter what...hmmm I think we're dangerously close to two women with big hair and long fingernails in Playboy.
I have no idea what Homolka's deal is/was...but I think it's bizarre how we decide who we can analyse, and why.
-